Follow up. I've been using Studio Pro 8 for a week now.
In all fairness, it's the best Studio One version yet by far and there are significant improvements. Most of my previous cosmetic and arrangement criticisms are still true, but many are moot since the DAW is largely customizable and I was able to fix most of them. Fender would be well-advised to make the customization of the windows and workflow a higher selling point, if only to tell legacy users they have options. Better yet, why not introduce cosmetic adaptations as new features to be selected rather than changing the stock workflow so much. In any event, if you don't like the layout, follow the Views menu to 'customization' and you should be able to fix most layout complaints.
Major improvements I've noticed from previous versions:
1) This DAW has yet to crash (knock on wood) or freeze. So far, the stability is really impressive. It seems things run faster, smoother, and my CPU is even breathing a little easier. They've done good work behind the scenes on this one. Give her a chance. Even the *faders* are smoother (can that even be a thing in the box??)
2) The edit visibility issues are improved with new colors. The thick white clip boundaries and highlighting when clips are selected is still an impediment to efficient editing because they block the details you really need to see to edit well. This needs to be addressed; even the clip highlight behavior in v5 was much more usable. But I'll give due credit- the whiteout highlight behavior of v7 was awful and they have improved it.
3) Not sure when they expanded the group menus on the channel modules but it's nice to be able to select 'none' and suspend a group without dissolving it. We still need group options for plugin settings, but there are more options for group linking than previous.
4) You can now edit automation directly over the clips as in ProTools which is a nice workflow enhancement. Note to Studio Pro designers, that inverse color scheme on the automation windows is *vastly* better for clip editing. Why not make it selectable?
For those who also have been frustrated as I was trying to set precise levels in the DAW (stuff like clip gain, faders, etc). I was able to pick up a utility from my trackball maker that allows me to slow my mouse action with the 'shift' key, which allows precision adjustments.
For the critiques:
1) Sorry, but the channel editor is ill conceived and not helpful at all. It's just as easy to skip it and call up the actual plugins, and their superior GUIs enhance both function and enjoyment. Which wouldn't be a problem if the channel editor didn't come up any time you inadvertently double click on the mixer channel strip. Can we please get a 'disable channel editor' option? It's really a pain. Especially since you have to click on the mixer channel strip to activate regular features like the pan options menu, or to type in a pan or fader level directly. Please allow us to disable this big needless pop up that must then be dismissed.
2) The 'loop follows active selection' feature doesn't work at all. It's completely random. That's been left unaddressed for 3 versions. Needs to be looked at, because when you select 'loop follows active selection'? It doesn't.
3) When adjusting values of automation points, right clicking a point gives you the option to directly type in a value. Super. But you have to mouse over and click again to do it. It needs to come up with an active cursor in the pop-up or at least come up with the window under the cursor.
4) Please do something to preserve the order of commands in the track inspector right click menu?? Why does the location of 'show automation' change every time I pull up this menu?
Suggestions:
1) How about a 'magnify point' feature for precise editing that creates a local zoom around the selected points. If you've ever been frustrated trying to highlight a particular automation point to edit or remove it, you can see the value of this option. There are many places in Studio Pro that you need to select a particular point and end up fiddling with the mouse to select it. This would allow you to zoom in and pick the item you want instead of fiddling the mouse to get the right tooltip to pop up.
2) Maybe for future updates, consider preserving the layout and preferences selected in the previous version rather than changing them automatically on update? Or offering a legacy layout restore option? You'll get less angry frustrated reviews from existing users like the one I posted last week. Most of my frustrations were due to cosmetic changes that should be options, not standard.
3) If I was into amp sims, I would find the latest offerings to be really paltry. Especially considering the whole "57 amps" flex. Guys, you didn't even bother making quality GUIs that match the real amps, and you treat them like modules. A Super Reverb did NOT have a gain knob but it did have both reverb and vibrato. Why would you provide a generic blackface preamp with a gain knob and a reverb *pedal* and call it a Super Reverb? You can do better. The D button does address the latency, but the sims are sad and not accurate even in their implementation. Also? A drop down menu of preset *names* is useless. Don't make me open them all to see which combination of parts you put there, let me scroll through and see the setups. Much more useful, particularly since the descriptions clearly do not reflect the actual amps they are named after.