• Hi and welcome to the Studio One User Forum!

    Please note that this is an independent, user-driven forum and is not endorsed by, affiliated with, or maintained by PreSonus. Learn more in the Welcome thread!

Studio Pro 8 - Discussion Thread

For those who have upgraded to FSP8, how are the color/saturation/contrast options for the overall GUI?

I'm still on S1 6.6.4 and like the default color scheme.

When S1 7 came out, many did not like the new default GUI and the fact that no amount of adjustment would enable getting close to the previous version's default or anything satisfactorily close. I know some improvements were made in the course of updates to version 7, but was it enough?

Does FSP8 make this better or worse than S1 7, or is it about the same? Any feedback is appreciated.
 
found another bug (the funniest thing is that it already existed with the 7.0 release)...sometimes muted tracks don't play even if the mute button is released) It can be fixed by disabling and enabling the global mute for the project.
Version 8 is definitely a real buggy.
 
Anybody else experiencing plugins sometimes not having any effect on audio, as if they were not inserted at all?
Seen it now with TBT Kirchoff EQ & PSP Chamber, especially when added via FX Chains made in v7 and when opening v7-songs.
 
For those who have upgraded to FSP8, how are the color/saturation/contrast options for the overall GUI?

I'm still on S1 6.6.4 and like the default color scheme.

When S1 7 came out, many did not like the new default GUI and the fact that no amount of adjustment would enable getting close to the previous version's default or anything satisfactorily close. I know some improvements were made in the course of updates to version 7, but was it enough?

Does FSP8 make this better or worse than S1 7, or is it about the same? Any feedback is appreciated.
btw there's a Gregor video you can find where he shows us his personal colors/saturation for V6 that I've borrowed and am glad I did. In other words, you may love it even more if you use even a few of his selections.
 
btw there's a Gregor video you can find where he shows us his personal colors/saturation for V6 that I've borrowed and am glad I did. In other words, you may love it even more if you use even a few of his selections.
Link?

I have had a complex about colors schemes and extreme whiteouts since v7 arrived.

Would give almost anything to return to my "gun-metal" grey v6.6.4 layout.

VP
 
I´m missing the group panel/overview in the mixer in SP 8. Really? Who thinks this is a great idea? Why remove this?

SP 8:
Bildschirmfoto 2026-01-18 um 00.23.38.png


SO 7:
Bildschirmfoto 2026-01-18 um 00.20.38.png


Group panel/overview only accessible via the tracklist SP 8:
Bildschirmfoto 2026-01-18 um 00.26.25.png
 
Link?

I have had a complex about colors schemes and extreme whiteouts since v7 arrived.

Would give almost anything to return to my "gun-metal" grey v6.6.4 layout.

VP
Pretty sure it was this one:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
. Als
 
Is this what you're looking for?

group.png
 
Last edited:
Aahh, I got it. It changed location, and is in the mixer-channel list now:
Thanx for hinting me in the right direction Bob!!!
Bildschirmfoto 2026-01-18 um 00.54.21.png
 
A few thoughts on virtual electric guitar . . .

I play both rhythm and lead guitar and have been doing this for decades; but a few years ago I switched to using virtual electric guitars.

Over the past few months I have devised a new perspective on arranging, where the focus is on tones, textures, and what I call the "New Modern Orchestra", as a prototype name.

This happened while I was writing Volume 10 of my ongoing series "The Art of Digital Music Production" and in no small way initially was a matter of not wanting to get lost in trying to explain what one might call "traditional arranging", which for example is what George Martin did when he arranged and composed the double string quartet for "Eleanor Rigby" (Beatles) at Paul McCartney's request, with the somewhat disturbing aspect being that George Martin is not credited with being a composer for the song, even though most of the music was done by George Martin, and Paul McCartney only composed the lyrics and melody. This was the way things were done at the time, and it continues to be the general rule, which includes not giving Quincy Jones composing credit for his stellar work on "Billie Jean" (Michael Jackson).

I suppose the distinction is that "songwriting" apparently is not the same as "composing". . .

Call it "lazy" for not wanting to attempt to describe and explain the nuances of Baroque, Big Band, Orchestral, Polka, Country Western, Ska, K-pop, Metal,and other musical genres; but (a) I tend to do everything "by ear", which is the way I taught myself how to play lead guitar and (b) I think that if you listen to music over-and-over and study what is happening, then you naturally develop an intuitive sense of what needs to occur when doing "traditional arranging".

You might not know or understand the logic and rules for Big Band arranging; but you can listen to Glenn Miller and Benny Goodman songs to develop an intuitive sense of how they arranged brass and woodwind sections.

Rollback the clock several decades or longer, and doing everything musically required musicians and real instruments, even when the instruments were synthesizers.

Everything was different conceptually in those days; and the general rule was that doing anything elaborate was restricted to famous musicians and singers, well-funded record labels, or at minimum to wealthy folks who could afford to hire studio musicians, orchestras, and recording studios.

This changed about two or so decades ago when personal computers became ubiquitous; and today it's possible, practical, and affordable to produce your own version of an album like "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club" (Beatles) using Fender Studio Pro 8, a nice assortment of VSTi virtual instruments, VST effects plug-ins, a BLUE Snowball USB microphone, and an Apple MacBook Pro while sitting inside a Volkswagen in a snowstorm when there is enough power in the car battery or you can run the engine.

Connect a few dots, and it's not only possible but also practical and affordable to have a vast collection of virtual instruments from all over this world in more musical genres that an expert music historian and theoretician could list or imagine, which makes it a bit mind-boggling.

Instead of trying to identify and delineate all the rules for arranging a Baroque double string quartet, I decided to focus on what happens when one is doing digital music production, which specifically at a high-level is focused on tones and textures.

Here in the sound isolation studio, there are 12 notes, 10 octaves, and a virtual cornucopia of tones and texture, which at present I am calling the "New Modern Orchestra (NMO)" and has tens of thousands of virtual instruments available as desired.

For reference, my motivation for this post is to respond to the various conversations regarding whether Fender Studio Pro 8 somehow is focused solely on Fender electric guitars and Fender guitar amplifiers, especially the stellar Fender Custom Shop Dual Professional Amp, but also a Marshall Half-Stack, with both of these being vacuum-tube amplifiers.

I have the skills and equipment to do electric guitar with real stuff; but with the exceptions of {string bends, glissandi, and whammying with a Fender Two-Point Tremolo}, it's easier and faster to do it with virtual stuff, which is what I usually do these days and have been doing for several years, as was the way I did my original song about "Flying Saucers" after reading news about UFO's being seen off the coast of Alaska, which being a science fiction aficionado and writer was too good not to inspire a SCIFI song.

As a subtle but relevant aside, it's a bit like the "James Bond Theme" (Monty Norman), "Born To Be Wild" (Steppenwolf), "Billie Jean" (Michael Jackson), and "Like A Virgin" (Madonna) essentially being the same song, at least for the definitive four-note phrase.

[NOTE: This is mixed for headphone listening (SONY MDR-7506 headphones). All the instruments are virtual, including Realivox Blue (RealiTone) my favorite virtual female soprano.]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

Attachments

  • SW-Fender-Dual-Professional-Amp.jpg
    SW-Fender-Dual-Professional-Amp.jpg
    130,1 KB · Views: 12
  • SW-Marshall-Half-Stack.jpg
    SW-Marshall-Half-Stack.jpg
    77,6 KB · Views: 10
  • 33.1-SW-FabulousFiftyMillionDollarTrinauralStratocaster-White.jpg
    33.1-SW-FabulousFiftyMillionDollarTrinauralStratocaster-White.jpg
    127,5 KB · Views: 10
I just updated and I must say I am rather impressed. They have certainly improved Studio One 7 for sure with lots of things. It is definitely a worthwhile update.
 
I just updated and I must say I am rather impressed. They have certainly improved Studio One 7 for sure with lots of things. It is definitely a worthwhile update.

Yes, I think so too - but there are quite a few bugs and omissions affecting people, so I'd hope that we get a hotfix or two over the next couple of weeks so that we can all enjoy it as it's supposed to be.
 
I just updated and I must say I am rather impressed. They have certainly improved Studio One 7 for sure with lots of things. It is definitely a worthwhile update.
I agree its just a bit much to take in at first. The free plugin gifts are really good, its awesome they started improving Impact/Sample1 immediately, the amp sims are best in class and if they quickly fix the bugs I guess its really cool they put so much effort into continuing S1. This must of been a crazy project and if Fender has the money to really fix some of the PDC bugs with S1 I am all for it. I am a little surprised they went with Fender studio rather than S1 Fender but what do I know about branding.
 
As Ari said himself, same code, same program just a different name. I think its better for sure now. I really like some of the new features.
 
I am a little surprised they went with Fender studio rather than S1 Fender but what do I know about branding.
Sorry to be pedantic, but Fender Studio is a different app. It’s Fender Studio Pro here.
 
Sorry to be pedantic, but Fender Studio is a different app. It’s Fender Studio Pro here.
When I look at the icon on my Mac, its hard to even see the "pro" underneath the "Fender Studio". When I put the mouse over the icon, it pops up as "Studio Pro 8". This subconsciously tells my brain that the main way to identify this program is "Fender Studio" (which is also weird considering it could be considered "Studio One 8" but that conflicts with the icon popup label) Its fine to be pedantic, but it might be more beneficial to relay this info to the actual company. (I use an M1 Pro if you want to test the icon on the taskbar for yourself)
 
I don't care about the name change and after opening a song, there is only "Studio Pro" in the main menu and the song title.(y)
And yes, I like the updated design. As before, it runs stable on my Mac mini, mostly doing orchestral / hybrid stuff with a bunch of sample libraries and plug ins. Some of the new features are really appreciated!

S1.jpg
s2.jpg
 
Back
Top