• Hi and welcome to the Studio One & Studio Pro User Forum!

    Please note that this is an independent, user-driven forum and is not endorsed by, affiliated with, or maintained by Fender. Learn more in the Welcome thread!

I feel sorry for the music industry

That's a somber future you're painting, but I can do you one better: Why would anyone need Studio Pro (or any other DAW for that matter) full stop?
Word. But that could be exactly where this goes when there are no guardrails and especially when people keep thinking this whole Ai thing is innocent and "awesome" and (my favorite) "fair".

Even Craig believes "morality" will win the day. That may be sorta true here in this forum where we are the proud keepers of our favorite little DAW - but for thousands/millions of others "out there" - morality is just a word that starts with M and they could give a crap what it means.

There is nothing fair about any of this - and as long as there are users that continue to feed that machine - it won't end well.

And yes - my view is grim - but I guess when Studio Pro suddenly disappears one day - with (or without) warning for reasons much more logical than mere morality (more like bankruptcy) - maybe then folks will understand.

VP
 
That's maybe a bit of a loaded question ... "Why would anyone need Studio Pro (or any other DAW for that matter) full stop?"

Most people have never "needed" expensive DAWs. There are free and inexpensive DAW's all over the place. The industry for the most part (or profit for DAW companies) is not driven on need, but want. It's a luxury, in a good economy we buy things that are not always literally necessary because we want to and we can afford it.

I ran a project studio for years and I didn't "need" a $10k mixing console, but I could afford it so I bought a d8b from Sweetwater and enjoyed it. I could have (actually did before) run paid sessions without it but that's not what we do, we buy stuff we want.

But the question falls into multiple different categories like... Why would anyone buy from X when the big mega store buys in bulk from China and has much lower prices?

Nobody (well, very few) cares about those jobs and those suffering industries, they just want better deals when they shop. See Amazon.
 
Last edited:
I actually think established DAW developers may face some serious challenges in the coming years, but perhaps for very different reasons than those being discussed here.
Just look at this forum.
How many discussions have we had about missing features in Fender Studio Pro? How many requests for GUI improvements, workflow changes, or functionality that users have been asking for, sometimes for years?
Until recently, developing your own solution was simply unrealistic for most musicians. Even if you had a great idea, turning it into working software required extensive programming knowledge, time, and resources.
AI-assisted development is beginning to change that.

And I think this is where things could become really interesting.
Imagine a musician who has been requesting a particular MIDI feature for years. Instead of waiting for a developer to implement it, they could potentially build and test their own solution.
Maybe the idea works brilliantly. Maybe they discover that their original concept doesn't work nearly as well in practice as they imagined.
Either way, they've learned something.
And if it does work, perhaps other musicians will find it useful too. Perhaps it inspires an entirely different approach, or even gives established developers new ideas.

That's how innovation can happen.
For decades, software development has largely determined which ideas musicians could actually try. If a feature wasn't implemented, most users simply had to live without it.

AI-assisted development could gradually change that relationship.
Of course, building a reliable, professional DAW is still a massive undertaking. AI doesn't magically eliminate the need for testing, debugging, maintenance, or technical expertise.

But it can make experimentation and prototyping dramatically more accessible.
And perhaps that's the real challenge for established software companies: not that AI will simply copy their products, but that users may increasingly be able to explore ideas and develop tools that commercial developers never considered worth implementing.

Personally, I see that as an opportunity for innovation rather than something we should be afraid of.
I'm already collecting ideas I've had for years, and now I finally have the opportunity to test them.

I've also started creating smaller tools based on simple thoughts like, "Hey, this would be really useful to have!"
I've already spent several weeks developing my own ComfyUI workflows and custom nodes to automate repetitive tasks, speed up my workflow, and make the software easier to use. And guess what? It actually works!
For me, it's becoming less about saying, "It would be nice to have feature XYZ," and then waiting years for some company to finally implement it.
Instead, it's increasingly becoming a simple question of: "Okay, why don't I just try building it and see if it works?"
And that's exactly what makes AI-assisted development so exciting to me.
 
AI... Bah humbug. :oops:

Nuff said!

Kindest regards
 
AI... Bah humbug. :oops:

Nuff said!

Kindest regards
This digital thing will never catch on…neither will having more than 24 tracks (they still teach track management, right? RIGHT?)….Every one knows the live room acoustics are far more important than control room acoustics…most people know that if you have to turn more than one eq knob while tracking, you have the wrong microphone …

Bah humbug sometimes still gives the best results
 
Back
Top