True, Trucky. I've always considered Presonus' Questions, or FR site as at least a service for others to access or share in conversation or support of their needs. Its all we can expect (as with most any suggestion box). It's simply an offering and people (including myself) shouldn't expect anything more from it. Too often people purchase something and think they're some major shareholder in the product. Sometimes they're even a self promoted board member. : ) Of course, as we all know, that doesn't mean users shouldn't request things. Far from it. They just shouldnt expect waiting for years as some lack of service. I've always felt a seriously good suggestion, oughtweighs a thousand bad ones. If one's past suggestions didn't resonate, then that's it. No matter how relevant we feel an FR should be implemented. It could probably even be a darn good idea. Its likely just not part of the next series of priorities, needs, or even usefulness to the program at large. Users should consider, if every, even good idea were implemented, Studio One would turn into a very slow performing, or convulted, over menu'd, DAW that would only produce more screams of unrest. Far be it, that would ever happen. : )
Hence my point about the slight scaling difference here is more of a pet peeve. That's not to say it's irrelevant, or diminish it (I supported it). It's simply a case of development are implementing bigger things right now. That's a good thing. Mmv, but from this camp, Studio One is still a lean, and quite efficient DAW with the same functionality, it always had. No deviations, skins, and do-dads that clutter its nature to work very well.
Onward and forward. Btw, nice face-lift on the newer Presonus Questions site.
OFS wrote: "They should

Real world and all that...".
Actually, it's real world as is. There are people in this forum that have a direct line to development.

That's not to say anything more will happen. Rather, that is to say, "real world" is rather....ehm..... real world.