• Hi and welcome to the Studio One User Forum!

    Please note that this is an independent, user-driven forum and is not endorsed by, affiliated with, or maintained by PreSonus. Learn more in the Welcome thread!

Probably the first song I would consider "finished" from Studio One.

biddi4

New member
Genre
Rock
Genre: Rock
Instruments: Live guitar DI tracks. Live Bass DI. Live: Vocals. Addictive Drums 2 for drums.
Effects: Waves SSL-G Channel strip. IK Multimedia Comprexor. Assorted Delays and Reverbs. SSL-G Bus Compressor, G-clip, L1 Ultramaximizer.
Special Techniques: Whatever I could do to make it sound good! Lot's of editing!
Released: 2025

I really don't know the range of expertice here, but even though I started recording this tune digitally in 2006, I consider mtself a newb. Willing to take constuctive critsism as well as glowing compliments, lol.

Let me know how this stands up to other rock mixes.
Thanks!
Mike

Take A Chance
 
Click here to listen:
Well, I think you're definitely on the right track for a rock mix. The mixing style kind of reminds me of Mayday Parade. As someone who has participated in multiple songwriter and mixing panels, I can pick some nits for ya...BUT note that these comments reflect my personal biases of what I want to hear when I mix a song. I've always said there are at least 20 valid ways to mix a song. However, the only one that matters is the one that expresses the artist's vision the best.

  • It's top-heavy frequency-wise. The bass needs to drive it more, with the bass and drums providing more "meat."
  • Provide more differentiation by aiming for three groups with their own sonic identity: vocals, guitars, bass+drums. One way to do that is to use EQ to cut in one section, which makes room for that same range in the other sections. Then each section can own the part of the frequency spectrum that serves it best, and come through loud and clear.
  • Pull back on the dynamics and maximization. Use DSP to bring up the sections that need more level, that gives you strength without the thinness that sometimes happens with compression.
  • Dynamics are good! They add to the emotional impact. I add very little dynamics processing when mixing. I save it for the mastering...typically around 6 dB of gain reduction with multiband limiting. I NEVER compress masters. I want those peaks and punch.
  • The vocals are good, don't be shy, bump 'em up a bit! (Personal bias alert: I'm old school about thinking vocals are always the most important part of a song.) Bring up the harmonies too, they give a cool variation.
  • When you hit the bridge, introduce a radical variation - like pull out the drums, or use acoustic guitars, change the processing on the guitars, something. You want to make sure that a song doesn't just flow in one direction. Change things up. Shock the listener (they love it :)).
Here's the kind of thing I mean about adding some disruption. On one recent song, I needed to have something really punch for two beats before the second chorus hit. The words for the vocal just before the chorus were "until then..." I tried everything (and I mean everything) to give the vocal super-strong instrumental support, but it wasn't a dramatic enough shift. I tried different effects on the voice...you name it.

All attempts were epic fails until I isolated the voice - no instruments - for those two beats and took off all vocal processing - no EQ, nothing time-based, just the raw sound that came out of the mic, cranked up. Because it was only for two beats, the effect was truly jarring - the contrast when the chorus came back in like a sledgehammer was just what the song needed.

I certainly don't want to sound overly-critical. Believe me, I wouldn't have taken the time to write all this if I didn't like the direction you're taking! I hope these comments give you some ideas that might be helpful for future projects.
 
Last edited:
Well, I think you're definitely on the right track for a rock mix. The mixing style kind of reminds me of Mayday Parade. As someone who has participated in multiple songwriter and mixing panels, I can pick some nits for ya...BUT note that these comments reflect my personal biases of what I want to hear when I mix a song. I've always said there are at least 20 valid ways to mix a song. However, the only one that matters is the one that expresses the artist's vision the best.

  • It's top-heavy frequency-wise. The bass needs to drive it more, with the bass and drums providing more "meat."
  • Provide more differentiation by aiming for three groups with their own sonic identity: vocals, guitars, bass+drums. One way to do that is to use EQ to cut in one section, which makes room for that same range in the other sections. Then each section can own the part of the frequency spectrum that serves it best, and come through loud and clear.
  • Pull back on the dynamics and maximization. Use DSP to bring up the sections that need more level, that gives you strength without the thinness that sometimes happens with compression.
  • Dynamics are good! They add to the emotional impact. I add very little dynamics processing when mixing. I save it for the mastering...typically around 6 dB of gain reduction with multiband limiting. I NEVER compress masters. I want those peaks and punch.
  • The vocals are good, don't be shy, bump 'em up a bit! (Personal bias alert: I'm old school about thinking vocals are always the most important part of a song.) Bring up the harmonies too, they give a cool variation.
  • When you hit the bridge, introduce a radical variation - like pull out the drums, or use acoustic guitars, change the processing on the guitars, something. You want to make sure that a song doesn't just flow in one direction. Change things up. Shock the listener (they love it :)).
Here's the kind of thing I mean about adding some disruption. On one recent song, I needed to have something really punch for two beats before the second chorus hit. The words for the vocal just before the chorus were "until then..." I tried everything (and I mean everything) to give the vocal super-strong instrumental support, but it wasn't a dramatic enough shift. I tried different effects on the voice...you name it.

All attempts were epic fails until I isolated the voice - no instruments - for those two beats and took off all vocal processing - no EQ, nothing time-based, just the raw sound that came out of the mic, cranked up. Because it was only for two beats, the effect was truly jarring - the contrast when the chorus came back in like a sledgehammer was just what the song needed.

I certainly don't want to sound overly-critical. Believe me, I wouldn't have taken the time to write all this if I didn't like the direction you're taking! I hope these comments give you some ideas that might be helpful for future projects.
Hey Craig, what a lovely reply! I really appreciate it! Ya, so, it's weird. I put some effort in to using a reference track this time and all I kept hearing was that my bass was too loud! So, that's my story, lol. I agree, that's the sound I want is that thick low bass and drums!

I hadn't heard of Maday Parade. I can see some similarities musically. Nice melodies, and everything resolves normally. Really good singer too.
I'm pleased to be compared to them!

I carved the kick and bass and was happy with that, (until I turned the bass down), and I also carved for the two guitars.
Admittedly, I didn't do much for the vocals. There's always so much to do, and I just wanted to actually finish something.

I'm not sure what DSP is. Saturation? I was just going for volume on the master. I really shouldn't do that I know. The mix without that is around -6 and the drums definitely sound better.

The vocals. Well, I have them louder than many other mixes in the past. I'm singing, and I still struggle with my own confidence. The BGV definitely should be higher too. Like, Journey is what I grew up on, and his voice is all you hear. I get it, but I kind of like the rock band with vocals that don't dominate. Definitely good advice though. All of it really.

This song is 40 years old, and that's the way I've heard the bridge ever since!
I've painted myself in a corner a little with these songs with the fact that I'm doing everything! When I was first learning to record, it was almost too difficult to manage the computer and the the playing and back and forth.
Now all that's easier, but I tend to not get too experimental with dropouts or huge dynamic swings. Sometimes, on an old song it feels better to just get it done. Haha. I have a bunch more newer tunes that I'm going to get in to soon. The next one just needs vox and solo. This one has a VERY unlikely bridge, so stay tuned.

So let me know what you meant by DSP if you have a quick second so I can work on that.
Again, this has been so helpful. I am glad I'm in the ballpark at least. Thank you soooo much.
 
I'm glad you found my comments helpful! By DSP, I mean using the clip gain envelope instead of traditional dynamics processing. I wrote a blog post about it, but unfortunately, it got nuked in the blog platform change. However, it is decribed fully in the The Huge Book of Studio One Tips & Tricks, as well as in Max Your Mix! (which just got a free update to version 1.4, so if you already have it, be sure to download the update).

And...I did a short video a couple hours ago to show the basics of how the clip gain DSP works with guitar sustain and vocals. I thought a video would get across the basic idea quicker than trying to explain it. The video isn't public yet, but it's not private or anything if you want to share it.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I'm singing, and I still struggle with my own confidence. The BGV definitely should be higher too. Like, Journey is what I grew up on, and his voice is all you hear.

Nobody seems to like the sound of their own voice. John Lennon hated his. But the voice is what makes the bond with the listener, it's the only part that comes directly from a human with no intermediary (e.g., guitar, drums, etc.). I put more effort into recording and editing my vocals than anything else.

Funny you should mention Steve Perry. I interviewed him once and when he realized he was talking to a musician and not a journalist, he really lit up. At one point I mentioned how much I liked his voice. When I told him I wished I could sing better, he started giving me vocal lessons! I can trace the beginning of taking my singing seriously specifically because of what he said, and I'll be forever grateful. He was such a kind and generous person to do that.
 
I'm glad you found my comments helpful! By DSP, I mean using the clip gain envelope instead of traditional dynamics processing. I wrote a blog post about it, but unfortunately, it got nuked in the blog platform change. However, it is decribed fully in the The Huge Book of Studio One Tips & Tricks, as well as in Max Your Mix! (which just got a free update to version 1.4, so if you already have it, be sure to download the update).

And...I did a short video a couple hours ago to show the basics of how the clip gain DSP works with guitar sustain and vocals. I thought a video would get across the basic idea quicker than trying to explain it. The video isn't public yet, but it's not private or anything if you want to share it.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Thanks Craig!
 
Nobody seems to like the sound of their own voice. John Lennon hated his. But the voice is what makes the bond with the listener, it's the only part that comes directly from a human with no intermediary (e.g., guitar, drums, etc.). I put more effort into recording and editing my vocals than anything else.

Funny you should mention Steve Perry. I interviewed him once and when he realized he was talking to a musician and not a journalist, he really lit up. At one point I mentioned how much I liked his voice. When I told him I wished I could sing better, he started giving me vocal lessons! I can trace the beginning of taking my singing seriously specifically because of what he said, and I'll be forever grateful. He was such a kind and generous person to do that.
I didn't see this yesterday. Holy crap! What an amazing experience. You wouldn't happen to have a recording of that, would you? I've been working on a lot of his ballads. I wanna be like him when I grow up!
 
You wouldn't happen to have a recording of that, would you?

No, sorry, the interview appeared in EQ magazine many years ago in either the late 90s or early 00s. I probably have the interview on a disk somewhere, but I did find an online archive of EQ magazine. The voice lessons weren't included in the interview, they happened after I had enough material about the band, recording, etc. and we were just hanging out. I don't think he knew who I was, he simply was a nice guy who was willing to share what he knew. I'm glad he's gotten back into music again.

I apologize if this hijacked the thread, let's get back to sharing ideas on how to make better music. DMs are probably better-suited to this kind of exchange. But since you mentioned Journey...
 
Lol, gotcha!

So I dug in to that song over the past two days and wow! Brought up the bass and actually beefed the kick up a little.
Then, I started over with the guitars eq leaving them closer to their original sound. Also, did some notching of them, which I hadn't done before. Really made them more pleasant and made it easier to separate the two different parts.

Got in to the clip gain thing and pulled back on the compression on the Vox and backgrounds. Also sculpted their eqs.

Even, worked on the solo eq.
Over all I cut quite a bit of high end from the whole song and you can hardly tell, but it is easier to listen to.
Now I think I can sing it better, so I'ma try that today I think. Then there's the bridge... May not change this one, but I'm not ruling it out.

Thanks for the inspiration!

Mike
 
Back
Top